Ineffective vs. Effective
Ineffective:
"ALIEN SPACESHIPS TO ATTACK EARTH IN NOVEMBER 2012!"
http://weeklyworldnews.com/headlines/26535/alien-spaceships-to-attack-earth-in-2011/
It says "the world's only reliable news" and this doesn't give them any credibility because there are other sources of reliable news. The topic also isn't believable.
"Spaceships--My Passion"
http://artships.com/
The design is very poor and even though we haven't learned about it, it looks like a ten year old made this. It just sported spaceships and didn't give any real information.
"Latest-UFO-Sightings"
http://www.latest-ufo-sightings.net/
The content and the reasoning for the content were ineffective to me.
"Universal Uclick"
http://www.universaluclick.com/comics/peanuts/
I just didn't think that it effectively spoke to me personally because it wasn't a topic I was interested in. I enjoy old time comics but the website wasn't appealing enough.
Effective:
"DSW"
http://www.dsw.com/?cm_mmc=google-_-Brand%20DSW%20Only_E-_-DSW%20Only-_-13446485
I love shoes and I think how they set up the website is appealing and I know they guarantee good business.
EPA Water News
http://water.epa.gov/
When researching water, I trust this site to give me accurate information because it has a .gov and the information is given by the EPA, whom I also trust.
"CNN"
http://www.cnn.com/
I feel like this is a creditable source. Obviously there will be some discrepancy among stories but for the most part, it is effective.
"Happy-Dictionary.com"
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/happy
I think dictionary.com is effective because it is able to give you the information you need and is simple and easy to work.